Move your scientific committee off spreadsheets. Academic Event matches reviewers to abstracts by topic, collects structured scores, and helps you accept, reject and organise the programme — with a complete audit trail.
Request your event →Conference peer review works best when the right reviewers see the right abstracts and scoring is consistent. Academic Event handles both: it matches each submission to reviewers by topic and expertise, collects structured scores and comments, and gives your committee one place to make decisions.
From a single programme-board view you accept or reject abstracts and organise the accepted ones into sessions — and because every change is logged, the whole process stays transparent and defensible.
Abstracts are matched to reviewers by topic and expertise, so each one reaches the most relevant people.
Reviewers rate submissions against your criteria and leave comments through a clean interface.
The committee accepts or rejects from a programme-board view and arranges accepted abstracts into sessions.
Send each abstract to reviewers with the right expertise instead of assigning by hand.
Collect consistent scores and comments that are easy to compare across submissions.
See accepted abstracts at a glance and organise them into sessions and tracks.
Every score, status change and decision is logged for complete committee transparency.
Submitted abstracts are matched to reviewers by topic and expertise. Reviewers score them against your criteria, and the scientific committee accepts or rejects from a programme-board view. Every action is recorded in an audit trail.
Yes. Reviewers are matched to submissions by topic and expertise so each abstract reaches the most relevant reviewers.
Yes. Every status change, score and decision is logged in a full audit trail, giving your scientific committee complete transparency.
Tell us your event name and we'll email a private link to set it up — it takes minutes.
Or email [email protected]